YC DATA · 6,287 COMPANIES · OCTOBER 2, 2026
FORMATION · FIRST SURFACED WINTER 2023

Cancer Therapeutics

Return to Signal
COOLED · WINTER 202383% confidenceObserved October 2, 2026Source: Description cluster · corroborated
The count
0.45×

13/936 → 8/1288; -0.77 percentage points of formation share.

W15W19S21W24Sp26S26
About this formation

The most striking thing about this batch is how few of these companies are actually building a drug in the conventional sense of one molecule against one target. SFA Therapeutics and Guardian Bio both work by redirecting the immune system rather than attacking tumors directly, while Alixia goes after the metabolic conditions of the tumor microenvironment instead of the cancer cells themselves, and Eugit Therapeutics is trying to solve tissue targeting as a platform problem that sits underneath any given drug. Rosebud Biosciences and Invitris push the shift further upstream still, one building patient-matched organoids to screen compounds and the other manufacturing synthetic proteins at scale, meaning the product being sold is often the infrastructure for finding or making a therapy rather than the therapy itself. That framing helps explain a real tension in the numbers: this formation is cooling at 0.45x, matching the broader Therapeutics and Biotech categories almost exactly, yet Oncology as a related formation is accelerating at 3.08x. Capital and founders seem to be migrating toward oncology-labeled, clinically-focused efforts and away from the earlier wave of platform and immune-modulation biotechs that defined 2021 and 2022 vintages like SFA and Guardian Bio. Yemaachi Biotechnology stands apart by expanding who gets access to precision diagnostics at all, sourcing from African patient populations largely absent from existing genomic databases, a reminder that part of this cooling reflects unglamorous, non-oncology-coded work still getting built. The pullback likely tracks tightening biotech venture funding since 2022 rather than any loss of scientific promise in tumor microenvironment or immune-based approaches.

The companies behind the signal — 8
Winter 2023
Invitris

Description classified into Cancer Therapeutics.

Summer 2022
Eugit Therapeutics

Description classified into Cancer Therapeutics.

Summer 2022
Guardian Bio

Description classified into Cancer Therapeutics.

Winter 2022
Alixia

Description classified into Cancer Therapeutics.

Winter 2022
Origami Therapeutics, Inc.

Description classified into Cancer Therapeutics.

Winter 2022
Rosebud Biosciences

Description classified into Cancer Therapeutics.

Summer 2021
Yemaachi Biotechnology

Description classified into Cancer Therapeutics.

Summer 2021
SFA Therapeutics

Description classified into Cancer Therapeutics.

Inside Cancer Therapeutics

Biotech

A primary internal company segment within Cancer Therapeutics, derived deterministically from the shared yc tag “Biotech”. This is a classification of current window members, not a causal layer or a separate time trend.

Other / unclassified

Measured-window members of Cancer Therapeutics that could not be assigned to a narrower shared YC tag or industry without forcing a classification.

Outside corroboration — does anyone else see this?

No comparable outside activity is connected yet.

Related formations
Therapeutics

24 completed-batch companies belong to both Cancer Therapeutics and Therapeutics, versus 0.4 expected by chance (55.3× enrichment; false-discovery-adjusted q=2.6e-36). This is a statistically distinctive co-membership, not a causal or containment claim.

Biotech

24 completed-batch companies belong to both Cancer Therapeutics and Biotech, versus 1.0 expected by chance (24.1× enrichment; false-discovery-adjusted q=1.1e-26). This is a statistically distinctive co-membership, not a causal or containment claim.

Drug Discovery

15 completed-batch companies belong to both Cancer Therapeutics and Drug Discovery, versus 0.4 expected by chance (38.2× enrichment; false-discovery-adjusted q=7.0e-19). This is a statistically distinctive co-membership, not a causal or containment claim.

Oncology

10 completed-batch companies belong to both Cancer Therapeutics and Oncology, versus 0.1 expected by chance (67.1× enrichment; false-discovery-adjusted q=4.8e-15). This is a statistically distinctive co-membership, not a causal or containment claim.

Precision Medicine

10 completed-batch companies belong to both Cancer Therapeutics and Precision Medicine, versus 0.2 expected by chance (44.7× enrichment; false-discovery-adjusted q=5.3e-13). This is a statistically distinctive co-membership, not a causal or containment claim.

Genomics

4 completed-batch companies belong to both Cancer Therapeutics and Genomics, versus 0.2 expected by chance (21.1× enrichment; false-discovery-adjusted q=0.0012). This is a statistically distinctive co-membership, not a causal or containment claim.

Similarly named categories — not necessarily the same thing

These share a word with “Cancer Therapeutics” but are tracked as separate categories. The real overlap below is the actual share of Cancer Therapeutics’s companies also found in that category — not a guess.

Citation

Cambrian Signal, “Cancer Therapeutics,” publication yc-2026-10-02-semantic-v8, snapshot October 2, 2026.
cambrian.jafar.com/formation/cancer-therapeutics